converge · Decision Making · 60–90 min · 8-8 people · medium energy

Inclusive Decision-Making (Based on Deep Democracy)

This method guides groups to make decisions that incorporate both majority and minority viewpoints, fostering a sense of shared ownership and commitment. It helps overcome groupthink by actively seeking and integrating diverse perspectives into the final decision.

When to use Inclusive Decision-Making (Based on Deep Democracy)

Use this method when you need to make a complex decision with a group and want to ensure that all voices are heard and considered, especially when minority opinions might be overlooked.

What it solves

Groupthink, dominant voices, overlooking minority opinions, lack of buy-in

How to run Inclusive Decision-Making (Based on Deep Democracy), step by step

  1. Assign roles (facilitator and decision-makers). Randomly select one person as the facilitator. (5-10 mins)
  2. The facilitator presents a scenario and budget. Brainstorm individual ideas for a single activity/donation/initiative. Record all ideas on a flip chart or whiteboard. Aim for 5-6 ideas. (15 mins)
  3. Actively seek alternative and opposing viewpoints. Use prompts to encourage unconventional ideas and challenge the status quo. Add 1-2 'outside the box' ideas to the list. (15-20 mins)
  4. Conduct a silent reflection minute, then vote openly on preferred options. Members can vote for multiple ideas they fully support. Identify the 'majority vote' idea. (20-25 mins)
  5. Engage only with members who voted 'no' on the majority vote proposal. Facilitate a discussion to identify enhancements that address their concerns. Conduct a new vote on the improved proposal. (20-25 mins)

Materials needed

  • Handout with scenarios and prompts
  • Flip chart or whiteboard
  • Markers
  • Timer

Facilitator tips

  • Empower the facilitator to create a safe environment where all opinions are respected.
  • Ensure the facilitator understands the prompts and can guide the discussion effectively.
  • If a unanimous decision emerges early, restart with a new scenario to practice integrating minority insights.

Common pitfalls

  • Facilitator dominance: Ensure the facilitator remains neutral and focuses on process.
  • Participants not feeling safe to share: Emphasize the importance of respectful listening and non-judgment.

Variations

  • Use different scenarios relevant to the group's context.
  • Adjust the voting method (e.g., dot voting) depending on group size and preference.

Running it online or hybrid

Use breakout rooms for small group discussions and a digital whiteboard for idea collection and voting.

What it produces

A decision that reflects both majority and minority viewpoints, documented enhancements to the original proposal.

Origin

Based on work by Myrna and Greg Lewis, adapted by Transition Makers — source

Build a session around Inclusive Decision-Making (Based on Deep Democracy)

METODIC places Inclusive Decision-Making (Based on Deep Democracy) inside a complete, timed session plan — agenda, worksheets, facilitator guide and slides — matched to your group and goal.

Generate a session with Inclusive Decision-Making (Based on Deep Democracy) · Try METODIC free