review · Problem Solving, Decision Making · 60–120 min · 1-10 people · medium energy

Process Tracing

Process tracing is a systematic method for investigating causal links between an intervention and observed outcomes. It involves gathering and analyzing evidence to assess the strength of support for a causal explanation, while also considering alternative explanations.

When to use Process Tracing

Use process tracing when you need to rigorously evaluate the impact of a program or policy, understand the mechanisms through which it achieved its effects, and identify potential unintended consequences.

What it solves

Lack of clarity on how a program achieved its results, difficulty in attributing outcomes to specific interventions, need for a robust and defensible evaluation.

How to run Process Tracing, step by step

  1. Define the outcome of interest and the intervention being evaluated. (15 minutes)
  2. Develop a theory of change outlining the causal pathway linking the intervention to the outcome. (30 minutes)
  3. Identify potential alternative explanations for the outcome. (15 minutes)
  4. Gather evidence to test the causal pathway and alternative explanations, using the four types of causal tests (straw-in-the-wind, hoop, smoking gun, doubly-definitive). (45 minutes)
  5. Analyze the evidence and draw conclusions about the strength of support for the causal explanation. (15 minutes)

Materials needed

  • Whiteboard or flip chart
  • Markers
  • Sticky notes
  • Relevant documents and data
  • Process Tracing Worksheet (optional)

Facilitator tips

  • Be prepared to adapt the theory of change as new evidence emerges.
  • Encourage participants to challenge assumptions and consider alternative explanations.
  • Focus on gathering high-quality evidence from multiple sources.

Common pitfalls

  • Confirmation bias: Seeking out evidence that supports the preferred explanation while ignoring contradictory evidence. Mitigate by actively searching for disconfirming evidence.
  • Data overload: Becoming overwhelmed by the amount of evidence. Mitigate by focusing on the most relevant and informative evidence.

Variations

  • Use a simplified version of process tracing with fewer causal tests for less complex evaluations.
  • Combine process tracing with other evaluation methods, such as contribution analysis or realist evaluation.

Running it online or hybrid

Use a shared document or whiteboard to capture evidence and causal links. Ensure clear communication channels for discussing findings.

What it produces

A detailed causal chain diagram, a report summarizing the evidence for and against different causal explanations, and a set of recommendations for improving the program.

Origin

Adapted from BetterEvaluation.org — source

Build a session around Process Tracing

METODIC places Process Tracing inside a complete, timed session plan — agenda, worksheets, facilitator guide and slides — matched to your group and goal.

Generate a session with Process Tracing · Try METODIC free